Why YAML is Better than JSON for API Collections
When designing Heapi's storage system, I had to choose a format for saving collections and environments. The industry standard has overwhelmingly been JSON. But as developers, we all know the pain of resolving merge conflicts in a massive JSON file.
The Problem with JSON
JSON was designed as a data interchange format, not a configuration or storage format for humans. It lacks comments, requires strict quoting, and doesn't handle multi-line strings gracefully (say hello to endless \n escapes in your request bodies).
When you commit a JSON-based API collection to Git, any minor change can result in noisy diffs, making code reviews frustrating.
Enter YAML
YAML solves these problems beautifully for API collections:
- Readability: Without the clutter of brackets and quotes, YAML is much easier to scan.
- Multi-line strings: Request bodies, scripts, and notes can be formatted naturally using YAML's
|block scalar. - Comments: You can document your requests right alongside the configuration.
- Git Diffs: Line-by-line diffs in YAML are clean and easy to resolve when merging branches.
Embracing Docs-as-Code
By using YAML, Heapi treats your API collections exactly like your code. You have total ownership of your data, and your team can collaborate using the same pull-request workflow they already use for the codebase.